deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Download Image
JPG, 800×600
more ▶

More from ~Norsehound

Featured in Groups:

Details

March 29, 2009
37.3 KB
800×600
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 7
Favourites: 56 [who?]

Views: 3,653 (1 today)
Downloads: 198 (0 today)
[x]
:iconnorsehound:
The Bellerophon, from Leo. Like the ill-fated Rycon, she's armed with a pair of heavy pulsars in the nose. Each can wipe out a baseship in one shot. Like Pegasus her construction is designed more for fighting than logistics. The only reason Pegasus was chosen over Bellerophon for the 5th fleet expedition is because Pegasus was more well-rounded than the purely offensive Bellerophon.

Bellerophon was the second Battlestar destroyed at Cimtar, after Atlantia, the President's Battlestar, was destroyed. Like Solaria she went down fighting, buying time for the Solaria to escape with the survivors of the ambush.
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconblacklion68:
Big beefy guns! Yes!
Reply
:iconpro12011:
Is this for the old or new battlestar galactica.
Reply
:iconikarus-tm:
never seen this ship in the series :/
u invented it : ?
Reply
:iconnorsehound:
Well... I fleshed it out.

I believe the Battlestar Bellerophon was mentioned in the original series, but like most of the battlestars we never actually see it.
Reply
:iconcaraig:
Now THAT looks 'the business!' With those two turrets on the side of her hammerhead she looks like she's got more than just a pair of pulsars as her main armament! I get a *very* strong Kushani vibe from the drive section.

I very much like the idea of each main battlestar being very, very distinct. It makes the Twelve Colonies a lot more independent-seeming. The Colonial Fleet, though, must be a doctrinal mess if each Colony has their own naval doctrine and shipbuilding style.
Reply
:iconnorsehound:
I wouldn't say it would be more disorganized than the various national navies across the world. Even though there are differences between them, all of them have common threads running in each of them. For example, most rank structures are similar, as well as the notions of various ships (Carriers are carriers, frigates are frigates, no matter what navy you're in).
Reply
:iconcaraig:
Hmm, I would agree, but up to a point. Even if the Colonies agreed to standardize their sub-capital ships -- capship escorts, cutters, patrollers, etc. -- each battlestar is apparently designed with a different philosophy and will need different kinds of support. A ship like the Solaria is probably tops when it comes to area defense, and so her frigates won't need to provide fighter and weapons screening... but she seems to lack the long-range punch of, say, Bellerophon, and so she'll probably need Tiger-class destroyers or something else to provide that alpha strike ability. Likewise, ships like Galactica and Pegasus are more logistics-heavy -- with large numbers of fighters/pilots and missiles -- than ships like Solaria and Bellerophon (presuming that pulsars don't need massive amounts of fuel to operate, which they might.) (Admittedly, the logistics needs might only be slightly different, but they might be more dramatic, too.)

Plus, a ship's mission will affect how it is deployed. A ship like Galactica, which is mainy a fighter carrier, will be deployed differently than the Bellerophon: Galactica will stand off at some distance while Bellerophon would move in to pulsar range.

I guess what I'm getting at, is that the Saggitans, with their advanced laser systems and armor, might have a much different deployment doctrine for their capital ships than the Leoi, who look like they enjoy BIG GUNZ. Leoi battlegroups might more closely resemble those from the second world war, while Caprican battlegroups might resemble more modern CVBGs (i.e. heavy anti-air screens and an emphasis on constant combat air patrol.)

Of course all this goes out the window if the Colonial Accords mandate that all ships except battlestars be the same throughout the Fleet, and only the battlestars are different. =) Which is very likely; standardizing the 'mass produced' vessels like cruisers and smaller, and it will end up being cheaper for all the Colonies; plus with the apparent multi-role ability of Colonial ships in general, a BSBG from one Colony might look much like that from any other Colony. And if battlestars are self-escorting and logistically virtually self-sufficient....

This is one of the things I really liked about BSG; the pre-Cimtar universe is wide open. It can be almost anything. The one thing we know is that a battlestar is the biggest, baddest ship that the Colonials can field. =) (And part of me rather liked how it was the old Adama who had been given command of it, a man of letters and learning, heck, almost a mystic in his own right.)
Reply
Add a Comment: